Monday, 20 November 2017

THE CYCLES OF LIFE


This article forms part of a collaborative article written by Ann Whiting and Lyn Anderson. To view the full article click on this LINK.

The Cycles of Life: an orthographic study

Recently my reflections on the gracious death and the beautiful birth of close family members, astonishingly falling on the same day, evoked some poignant teaching memories of guiding young children with their study and ultimate discoveries of the ‘cycles of life’.
The cycles of life, the circles of life breathing in every corner of our living world.
Whether it be the study of seasonal changes through the lifeline of trees, an arbour of oaks or chestnuts that swathe us with their crisp fallen leaves and fascinating seeds or the evergreen pine that doesn’t ever seem to change;


or the sensations of caressing the soft greens and yellows of the mountain meadows; or the discoveries of the strong, remarkable  plants of the hot humid tropics;


or the close scrutiny of the jelly-like membranes of an egg and the excitement of chicks hatching in our  organic garden;


or a quest for understanding,“Where does the rain come from?”;



or the joy of revealing who we are…the beginning!
All momentous signs of the ‘cycles of life’.

And so we embark on an orthographic journey, concurrently with our deep study of ‘there are many cycles that affect life on earth’.




We really like the word cycles and select this word to study deeply; to investigate its orthography through the three domains of morphology, etymology and phonology.


What is cycle? What is cycle not?
These questions are pondered and deliberated on consistently throughout the study, guiding our quest for understanding.
We revisit the questions often with our students listening carefully how they communicate and articulate their understanding through the learning experiences that inspire and provoke.
A cycle is not linear, straight or fixed. A cycle is not irregular but may have irregularities as our current weather patterns  reveal.
A cycle is circular, constant and infinite. We keep returning to the beginning but is there a beginning point?
‘Cycles are everywhere in nature. They can occur over the length of a day, a season, a year, or longer.’ (Pete Mara)
“A bicycle, that goes round and round…,” exclaims a 4 year old leads to an enthusiastic conversation amongst the children as we determine which of the bike’s components goes round and round.
What parts cycle?
Everyone has something to say because bicycles are part of our world.



We plant conceptual ‘learning seeds’ as the children closely inspect the various mechanical parts of the bike. Through close observation the children sketch the bicycle with a range of art materials.
We scribe the children’s thoughts and plant important orthographic ‘learning seeds’ as we announce aloud the orthographic structures of bicycle and bike.
<bi + c-y-c-l-final non syllabic <e>>      <b-i-k- final non syllabic <e>>

We talk about our collection of recycled materials to design, create and construct.

We announce aloud the orthographic structure of <re+cycle +ed> as we scribe the children’s thinking. We specifically announce ‘replace the final non syllabic with the vocalic suffix <-ed>.
We ask the children to think about the meaning relationship between <cycles> and <recycled>.
Through these experiences we  provide opportunities to build an understanding of the free base element <cycle>. We carefully note the children’s deepening understanding as they verbalise their ideas and thoughts and through conversations that occur in the learning environments. We especially note the changes that occur for the non-native English speakers and those that struggle with our language as they encounter new and unfamiliar lexicon.
Morphological Relatives
Cycles

We begin to discover words that belong in the same family.  As we extract words from the word bag the students hypothesize which words may be or may not be in a family. We announce aloud the structure of each word as it is revealed and discussed.

<cycle + s>   <tri + cycle>  <cycle + ing >



The children notice that the words all share a common base element. We hypothesize <cycle>.


The children illustrate the words collaboratively and our word-web begins to grow, as does the children’s understanding, each time we encounter it.



Later we revisit these words to provide evidence that they do belong in the same family.
The Etymological Story
Stories are made of words and every word has a story.

Cycle as a noun was attested in the late 14c. It is derived from Greek kyklos, ‘any circular body, circular motion, cycle of events’, indirectly via Late Latin cyclus,
ultimately able to be traced back 5,500 years to a Proto Indo European root *kwel-(1) "to revolve, move, round".
This ancient root has produced, amongst a myriad of other interesting connections, distant etymological relatives such as collar, colony, pulley and wheel.





Cycle as a verb was attested in 1842 carrying a meaning of ‘revolving in cycles’.


In 1883 specifically referring to riding a bicycle.(Etymology Dictionary)  



We use images to  share the etymological journey of cycle with the children. We want them mostly to understand that it derives, indirectly, from Greek kyklos.
We ask:“What do you notice?”
The children ask about the spelling of <k> in the Greek word. We show how the word is spelled in Greek κύκλος. We talk about how a medial <y> in a base element is a reliable sign that the word has derived from Greek.
On another day we share the story of Cyclops, literally  ‘round eyed’. The children have discovered the story in the library and of course they wish to know more.

How is it Built?
We return to the  selection of words we have hypothesized sharing the free base element <cycle>. We model the assembly of the word sum, announcing aloud the written elements, pausing at the morphemic boundaries and announcing any suffixing changes. We find evidence of all the elements we have constructed.


As we begin to construct the matrix the children assemble the word sum on small white boards or in their word inquiry journals.

We write the word sum for each complex word before we add further elements to the matrix. We continually refer to the word-web to select words to place on the matrix.

c-y-c-l-final non syllabic e ... ing is rewritten as c-y-c-l-replace the e ... ing, cycle”.

The simultaneous actions of writing and announcing aloud ensures the internalization of all the elements.


                                     

We do this over a period of time, throughout the day, during the week focusing on one or two word sums at a time. The children take their matrix home to share with their family. We continue to explore the subtle differences between each word that share the free base element <cycle>.


The children choose to add to their matrix and build further words.

Simultaneously we continue our deep study of cycles in nature. We decide to focus on the cycle of day and night to appreciate and realise the motion of the earth orbiting the sun.

 
Phonology
With our knowledge of the morphology and etymology well embedded, we now embark on a study of the phonology of <cycle>, to investigate the significant graphemes and phonemes that bring further sense and meaning.
We know that morphology and etymology drive phonology and therefore we can only investigate a word’s phonology within the domains of morphology and etymology.
The phonology of the free base element <cycle>:
4 graphemes  <c> <y> <c> <l>
the single, final, non syllabic <e>
4 phonemes /s/ //  /k/ /l/
As we hoped, the children are questioning and discussing the different functions of the single letter grapheme <c> in the initial and medial positions of <cycle>.
It is necessary for the children to understand:
  • the same grapheme can and will represent different phonemes and
  • the same phoneme can be represented by different graphemes.
The orthography of <c> provides the relevant learning opportunity to deepen these critical phonological principles. We study and analyse the single letter grapheme <c> which can represent two different phonemes /s/ and /k/.
The linguistic terminology: grapheme, phoneme, IPA, angle brackets and slash brackets naturally occur in our everyday discourse.
As with all our quests, we need to ensure the learning community understands the meaning of the words we will use to analyse phonologically.

                                     

The children take part in the trading game to communicate the meaning of their word. The children trade words and move to another partner.


Through this collaborative task the children encounter many words, building and deepening their personal lexicon. We deliberately partner ourselves with children who need support to understand their initial word. After this the children support each other.

The children collaboratively illustrate the words and return the words to the word bag.
During the next encounter the children select a word from the word bag and identify the position of the grapheme <c> in their word. We discuss the circumstances of this grapheme: initial, medial or final?
We guide the children through a concept attainment quest.

The children place their word on the Venn diagram as directed by us. Their role is to think about our thinking.
“Why did I ask you to place your word in the red circle or the blue circle or the overlapping part?”

“How interesting that cycle and circle are placed in the overlap!”


We revisit the phonological analysis over a number of days so the children have time to ponder on the placement of the words.
When we reconvene as a group the children discuss and share their hypotheses.   
We decide as a learning community that the single letter grapheme <c> is representing either /s/ or /k/ or both in the case of circle and cycle.

    

                                 
During the next weeks we revisit the phonology of <c> so that the children develop their understanding of grapheme choices. We encourage the children to add other words to the growing collection as they encounter them in books or when writing.

We revisit the vowel letters and learn how to script the pathways of each letter. The children especially enjoy scripting the beautiful ligature of the vowel letter < y>.


We plant further phonological ‘learning seeds’ so the children will encounter other phonemes represented by the single letter grapheme <c>; or other graphemes that represent the phoneme /k/.
Questions?
We are left with many questions as we continue our orthographic study.
Throughout our quest we read and revisit Jeannie Baker’s stunning literary text Circle.


"Tiny godwit birds follow ancient, invisible pathways in an infinity of sky.
‘Circle’ captures the sheer wonder of this migratory journey..." 
We wonder why the author has chosen the title Circle.
We feel and see the cyclic nature of the bar-tailed godwit’s annual journey in the text.
“Why not cycle?”
We wonder about cycle and circle.
“Are they etymologically related?”
We would like them to be related, but we know we need to provide evidence…


This study is an ebb and flow, a cycle, it’s cyclical, we are continually returning to our quest to deepen our learning and those of our students.
___________________________________________
To view the full article please click on this LINK. This will take you to Ann and Lyn's new Blog, Caught in the Spell of Words. Ann and Lyn are collaborating to demonstrate the power of studying orthography with the very young and our eldest students, explicitly embedded in the realms of meaningful and inspirational learning contexts.


Caught in the Spell of Words
stories are made of words and words are made of morphemes





Wednesday, 1 April 2015

A Video of Deep Understanding


Often I am asked...
Is this just about spelling? 
or 
How is this possible with young children?

This VIDEO describes my response, perfectly!

These two curious six year old orthographers, who demonstrate 
such delight and wonder, whilst investigating their significant words,  
embody what is, and can be, possible when studying orthography with young children.

"Nothing motivates learning more than understanding."

Studying orthography encompasses:
  • a quest for knowledge and understanding
  • thoughtful, scholarly questions
  • an ongoing learning journey
  • a thirst for more
  • wonder and curiosity



Thank you for contacting Lyn at
inquiry.beyondtheword@gmail.com
if you share or use this video.





Monday, 24 November 2014

The power of one!


Although this article is about a number of significant orthographic principles there are two topics that are particularly pertinent for me:
  • Unravelling the 'story' of one word reveals the intertwined 'stories' of many other words.
  • Investigating <one> clearly demonstrates that meaning and structure are the main concern of English orthography not pronunciation!

Recently, during math week, we investigated the number words, a wonderfully rich source of orthographic understandings. In education, <one> is generally considered a 'sight word' or a 'high frequency word', often a word memorised in isolation. It only seems logical to me, if words are considered high frequency, then we should be investigating and analysing them to fully understand the 'how' and 'why' of the spelling.

A teacher recently asked, "How can you investigate all the 'sight words'...that seems impossible?"
Do you know the singer/songwriter Paul Kelly? One of the songs he sings strikes a chord with me. Its called "From little things, big things grow." That's what happens when you dig deep with one, small word...learning grows, change happens, hypotheses form!

This is our inquiry into the reason for the initial grapheme <o> and 
the final, single, silent <e> in the spelling of <one>?

What does it mean?
We determined, as a class, that <one>
must be the base because 
we couldn't 'peel away' any 
structural affixes.
As in all orthographic investigations we began with a discussion of the meaning of <one>, which included a discussion about the homophone <won>. We briefly discussed how <won> was the past tense of <win>, hence the initial, single grapheme <w> indicating the connection between these words. The students had no difficulty dealing with the concept: different meanings, different spellings where possible.

What is its structure?
Even though it seems quite obvious that <one> is the base it is important to consistently model the process of providing evidence when identifying the morphemes. We determined that <one> must be a base as we couldn't justify any known affixes.

Also, the children immediately hypothesised that if <one> wasn't spelled with the final, single, silent <e> then it would be the function word <on>. Study Real Spelling's tutorial to understand the lexical and function word convention. Often the final, single, silent <e> is only taught in terms of its function to indicate that a previous vowel is long. However, it has many varied and important roles in English spelling that need to be discovered and investigated.

I wanted the children to begin to understand the various functions of the final, single, silent <e> which we will be investigating soon.

What are its relatives?
Our next task was to identify other words that could be related in meaning and structure.

One student suggested <ones>... "You know, the ones as in the tens and ones".
The children have recently been investigating place value and the numerical position of digits. I was thrilled this student was able to make connections with other learning.
The children were perplexed that they had difficulty thinking of other related words. I suspect this is what happens when words are learned in isolation...we really do limit learners' ability to think 'beyond'. I predicted this would be a challenging part of the investigation, so I had prepared a word bag with possible words.
During this investigation I wanted the children:
  • to dig deep to find clear evidence that the hypothesised words were actually related and connected.


Included in the word bag were words such as:
<only> <once> <no-one> <none> <alone> <lonely> <atone> <onion> <lonesome>
Some of these words would be unfamiliar, adding to 
the children's expanding lexicon.

As each word was revealed, the children were surprised and delighted to discover words that they would not have previously thought of. The children also realised the different pronunciations of the <o> in each word. This reinforced the importance of naming the base by announcing it-pronunciations shift according to the affixes that are fixed.
The children loved that <alone> meant 'on your own-just one person', 
now recognising its connection to <one>.
They had no difficulty identifying the <al-> prefix and then constructing the word sum:  
al + one --> alone
However, I did explicitly help the children identify other words where <al-> was also evident as a 
 prefix, such as <altogether> <always>. 
The children hypothesised that <al-> seemed to be like the base <all> in meaning!
<none>  
The children suggested "not any" and I deepened their learning by adding: "like 'not one'."
The children wondered about <n-> as a prefix. A great question...which I briefly discussed, without overloading with too much information. I modelled a hypothesis for the word sum 
n(e) + one --> none  
indicating that <ne-> was an old English prefix meaning 'not, no'. 
With an older group of children this would have been placed on the 'wonderwall' 
for small group or independent investigation. 
<lonesome>: an unfamiliar word for many of the children.

 I told the children that <lonesome> was like a 'cousin' to <one> and that we would discover why with some other words, not yet revealed.


As each word was revealed we discussed the relationship between <lonely> <loneliness> <lonesome> and related the 'story' of how the base <lone> came into the English language.
Stories have a significant impact on young children's learning (or probably any age really)...
...stories stick, they make sense-it's how the brain remembers 
important information and makes connections.

Each time we discovered a word we attempted to construct a word sum to identify if the word had <one> as part of its structure. They loved discovering the story of <only>, realising the word sum as: one + ly --> onely.The children wanted to study this word further to discover what happened to the <e>...and agreed that it should be part of the spelling. So much rich discussion and thought from just one small word!
What about <onion>?
Did you know that <one> and <onion> were related?
Such a surprising but important discovery.

Revealing the word <onion> caused much surprise and laughter and exclamations that <onion> couldn't possibly be related.
"Well let's check first...how about we find the word in our word origin book. 
Remember how we discovered that <turn> and <turnip> were related?"
I modelled how to locate and read the necessary information to the children. Surprisingly we discovered that onion came from the Anglo French 'union' and was clearly related to 'one,unity'.

To help the children absorb and understand this information I drew an onion...we discussed the part that lived under the soil (the bulb)...the  part that we eat. Then I drew garlic (the children knew garlic as it is a major ingredient in many Indonesian dishes and so were familiar with it) and we discovered that garlic had lots of bulbs but onion only had one bulb.
Then by constructing the word sum <one/ + ion --->onion> we were able to 
provide evidence of the same structure.
The kids loved this and were very eager to share this amazing information with their families.
For the full story view Gina Cooke's inspiring TED movie Making Sense of Spelling explaining the connection of onion to one. Brilliant!


To finish this first session the children chose a word and shared its meaning as a reflection of their learning and understanding.

We placed the selected words on the word web, 
beginning to make sense of the base <one>.
The children hypothesised which words belonged to the 'inner family' and which they thought belonged to the 'outer family', like cousins. Initially the children were unsure about the connection of <once> but understood that it meant 'at one time'.


Discovering more: origins of <one>.
 This student is recording important information
about the word <onion> and its connection to <one>.
The following day we returned to our investigation and revisited what we had previously discovered.
I started this session with John Ayto's Word Origin books. In pairs, the children identified <one> and I summarised their findings. We discovered that <one> was an Old English word spelled <an> and was also the source of 'an' and 'a' and was pronounced in the same way as <only> during this period of time!

We then constructed a more permanent word web. Each student recorded the 'story' of one word to add to the word web. As each child scribed their word they were reminded to announce the morphemes and graphemes.
<atone> a new word for the children
<at + one --> atone>
literally 'at one' with oneself.
We had an interesting discussion 
about <once> and decided it 
should belong in the 'inner' word family 
because of its history 
 OE 'anes' (same root as 'one').
This is our word web identifying words related in meaning and structure.

"The word web doesn't have all the words...it's not complete...it doesn't have all the story... BUT it's enough for now to help these children 
truly deepen their learning in so many ways."

Maybe our hypotheses will change as we come across more evidence.
How many words have we discovered and investigated, just from one word?

And I'm absolutely certain that these children not only know how to spell <one> but more importantly know why!

The children also shared their learning at the school assembly! 


 

This was a rich investigation involving inquiry, questioning, study, leading to our next investigation:                              <two> and why the <w>?
 

 One student described <twilight> 
as "the zone between
midnight and sunlight!" 


The children identified the grapheme sequence (t+w) as having the meaning of 'twoness'.
The joy of unravelling the stories!

For further orthographic study refer to the Real Spelling Toolbox2:
  • Kit 3 Theme J  The spelling of numbers
  • Kit 1 Theme D The functions of final, single, non-syllabic <e>
Give me a shout! 
If you happen to be using my blog please drop me a line and let me know what you think, what you would like to see, what you enjoyed!  inquiry.beyondtheword@gmail.com